ArticleScientific reports2025
Application of machine learning models for predicting depression among older adults with non-communicable diseases in India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of the use of artificial intelligence as a psychological assessment tool.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression among older adults is a critical public health issue, particularly when coexisting with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). In India, where population ageing and NCDs burden are rising rapidly, scalable data-driven approaches are needed to identify at-risk individuals. Using data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) Wave 1 (2017-2018; N = 58,467), the study evaluated eight supervised machine learning models including random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, SVM, KNN, naïve bayes, neural network and ridge classifier, for predicting depression among older adults. Model performance was assessed using a 70/30 train-test split and stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Performance evaluation metrics included AUROC, PR-AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score and interpretability via SHAP. Random forest outperformed all other models, achieving an AUROC of 0.996 and an accuracy of 95.6% with F1- score of 0.954 demonstrating excellent discrimination and calibration. Decision tree followed closely with AUROC of 0.915, accuracy of 91.5% and F1- score of 0.908. Key predictors of depression included poor sleep, age, BMI, IADL limitations, MPCE quintile, religion, smoking, education and physical inactivity. SHAP values validated the clinical plausibility of these features. A reduced-feature model using the top 12 predictors retained high accuracy, enhancing interpretability. The findings demonstrate the utility of ML models, particularly random forest, for identifying depression risk in older adults. The integration of interpretable techniques, SHAP along with Information Gain enhances clinical relevance. These results have potential implications for scalable screening strategies and policy-driven interventions in geriatric mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.