ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated assessment and detection of third molar and inferior alveolar nerve relations using UNet and transfer learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Panoramic radiographs (PRs) are widely used in assessing the relationship between the mandibular third molar (MM3) and the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). The relationship of MM3 and IAN is a critical consideration in oral and maxillofacial surgery due to the risk of nerve injury that can lead to anesthesia in the lower lip or chin. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of different transfer learning models in classifying these relations into four classes after detecting and segmenting the MM3 and the IAN using a new method with the UNet model. 714 PRs from more than 500 patients, representing four classes, were utilized in a UNet model to annotate the MM3 and IAN. Then, the annotations were extracted and augmented to yield 1021 images, thereby achieving a more balanced distribution of samples in each class. Different transfer learning models were evaluated in classifying the images using 10-fold cross-validation. The UNet model achieves an accuracy of 0.97 in annotating the images. The transfer learning models performed well. The best model, DenseNet121, achieved an average accuracy of 0.84, precision of 0.86, recall of 0.84, and F1-score of 0.85 across all folds and classes. The proposed approach demonstrates high performance compared to other works, classifying four classes and achieving similar or better performance than other techniques. It can also benefit dentists at the annotation and classification stages. Based on our results, this approach holds promise for opening several research directions in the future.Trial registration: This study was approved by the internal review boards (IRB) of the Jordan University Hospital (JUH) (Ref. No. 10/2025/3202).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.