ArticleNPJ vaccines2025
Comparison of major, minor and junctional circumsporozoite protein epitopes for malaria vaccine design.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibody fine specificity correlates with protection from malaria for the RTS,S vaccine in young African children: A post hoc analysis of a phase IIb randomised controlled trial.PLoS medicine · 2026Trial
- Comparative assessment of tissue cross-reactivity and pharmacokinetic half-life of malaria monoclonal antibodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently approved malaria vaccines (RTS,S/AS01 and R21/Matrix-M) contain the tetrapeptide major repeats (19x NPNA) and C-terminal domain of the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium falciparum. Incorporating the junctional (NPDP) and minor repeat (NPNV) epitope targeted by protective human monoclonal antibodies into immunogens is hypothesized to improve vaccine efficacy. However, comparisons of such candidates have yielded contradictory results due to inter-study differences. Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) capsid virus-like particles displaying the minor repeat, junctional, and major repeat epitopes were compared in an intravenous challenge model. Despite high cross-reactivity and in vitro inhibition, minor repeat candidates did not confer sterile protection in vivo. Constructs displaying major repeats NPNAx20, NPNAx5, and a junctional+minor repeat epitope induced sterile protection. Head-to-head comparisons of selected TMV vaccines and RTS,S revealed equivalent in vivo liver burden reduction. TMV-NPNAx20 was selected for clinical-grade antigen manufacture based on its equivalent reduction in parasite burden at lower antibody concentrations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.