ArticleNature communications2025
Template Learning: Deep learning with domain randomization for particle picking in cryo-electron tomography.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph identification of proteins in tomograms (GRIP-Tomo) 2.0: Topologically aware classification for proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Integrating in situ single-particle cryo-electron microscopy with cryo-electron tomography for high-resolution structural biology in native cellular contexts.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Template Learning: Deep learning with domain randomization for particle picking in cryo-electron tomography.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) enables three-dimensional visualization of biomolecules and cellular components in their near-native state. A key challenge in cryo-ET data analysis is particle picking, often performed by template matching, which relies on cross-correlating tomograms with known structural templates. Current deep learning-based methods improve accuracy but require labor-intensive annotated datasets for supervised training. Here, we present Template Learning, a technique that combines deep learning accuracy with the convenience of training on biomolecular templates via domain randomization. Template Learning automates synthetic dataset generation, modeling molecular crowding, structural variability, and data acquisition variation, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for annotated experimental data. We show that models trained using Template Learning, and optionally fine-tuned with experimental data, outperform those trained solely on annotations. Furthermore, Template Learning provides higher precision and more uniform orientation detection than template matching, particularly for small non-spherical particles. Template Learning software is open-source, Python-based, and GPU/CPU parallelized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.