ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Altering physician referral practices is challenging, but not impossible: spine assessment clinic quality improvement study.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccess to medical specialists is a persistent challenge, with neurosurgical spine services reporting some of the longest waits across all fields. Inappropriate and incomplete referrals contribute to delayed access to these providers. Referral guidelines and physician education have been shown to decrease such inefficiencies. Therefore, the goal of this study was to address inappropriate referrals directed to the neurosurgical spine assessment clinic via implementation of a quality improvement initiative. We hypothesised that appropriate referrals, which included patients with potential surgical pathology and fulfilled referral criteria, would increase by 25% following referral guideline distribution.
methodsA three-phase study was implemented: (1) baseline data were collected from preintervention referrals by noting the reason for consultation and if certain information, deemed relevant for an appropriate referral, was included; (2) a referral guideline, outlining when and how to refer, was distributed to family physicians in the region; and (3) postintervention referrals were collected and analysed as in phase I.
resultsA total of 404 referrals were collected (161 pre-intervention and 243 post-intervention). A 36% increase in patients who were deemed appropriate surgical candidates was reported post-intervention (p=0.044), with an escalation in the proportion of patients requiring neurosurgeon assessment observed over time. Limited improvements were appreciated in the presence of the criteria indicated for inclusion in a referral document.
conclusionWhile challenges remain when attempting to modify the referring behaviours of primary care physicians, this research has demonstrated that guidelines aimed at enhancing specialist directed referrals can lead to improvements in their performance. Nonetheless, translating guidelines into practice is a recognised issue, often requiring time and multiple exposures. Active forms of medical education and multifaceted interventions have been demonstrated to be the most effective means of implementing guidelines into practice, an approach that could further address referral inadequacies in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.