Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41043853›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Impacts of Global School Feeding Programmes on Children's Health and Wellbeing Outcomes: A Scoping Review.

Amy Locke, M James, Hope Jones, Rachel Davies, Francesca Williams, Sinead Brophy

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Systems-Based Dialogue With Secondary School Students to Explore School Food Environments That Promote Healthy People and Planet.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy LockeCentre for Population Health, Swansea University, Swansea, UK 968097@swansea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9345-1632
M JamesCentre for Population Health, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7047-0049
Hope JonesCentre for Population Health, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4312-476X
Rachel DaviesCentre for Population Health, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Francesca WilliamsCentre for Population Health, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Sinead BrophyCentre for Population Health, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-2858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSchool feeding programmes (SFPs) are widely implemented to address child poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition, yet evidence on their influence on children's health outcomes is limited. With ongoing debate around universal versus targeted provision, this scoping review aims to map global literature on SFPs, identify which health and well-being outcomes are reported, and explore how these outcomes vary by programme type (targeted vs universal).

designScoping review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework. DATA SOURCES: Four electronic databases-Medline, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar-were searched in December 2023 and July 2025. Reference lists of included papers were also screened. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included studies examined the impact of SFPs on physical, emotional, psychological and social health outcomes in children aged 5-16. Only English-language studies published between 2009 and 2025 were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted using a structured template and reviewed by multiple authors. Due to the heterogeneity in study designs and reported outcomes, a narrative synthesis approach was used to group findings thematically, following established guidance for narrative synthesis in systematic reviews.

resultsA total of 44 papers were included in the final review, spanning 13 countries and published between 2009 and 2025. SFPs were associated with healthier weight status, improved dietary intake, better social engagement and reductions in stigma. Targeted programmes addressed food insecurity but were more often linked to stigma and poorer mental health outcomes.

conclusionsUniversal SFP were effective at improving children's health outcomes such as healthy weight, improved behaviour and social support. Overall, both targeted and universal SFP positively impact children's health outcomes and address health disparities.

Indexed as

Child HealthFood ServicesSchoolsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFood InsecurityGlobal HealthHumansHealthNutritionPUBLIC HEALTHSchools

Identifiers

PMID41043853
PMCPMC12496081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.