ArticleBMJ open2025
General surgery nurses' views on preoperative spiritual care: a qualitative descriptive study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Negotiating faith in a hospital bed: A qualitative exploration of barriers to prayer (Belitung nursing journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSpiritual care has been shown to assist patients in managing anxiety, fear of death and existential concerns commonly encountered during the preoperative period. Nevertheless, surgical clinics often fail to prioritise this dimension of care. Accordingly, it is essential to gain a thorough understanding of how surgical nurses perceive and implement spiritual care. This study aims to describe the views of nurses working in surgical units regarding the provision of spiritual care in the preoperative phase, the challenges they encounter and the factors that influence this process.
designA qualitative descriptive study using an inductive thematic analysis approach.
settingThe study was conducted in the general surgery units of a tertiary-level hospital providing healthcare services to a diverse patient population, with the aim of enhancing nurses' views related to spiritual care.
participants18 nurses with a minimum of 6 months of experience in surgical units were selected using purposive sampling. Head nurses and those on leave during the data collection period were excluded from participation.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted via video conferencing or telephone between September and October 2023, each lasting between 45 and 60 min. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis method. Data collection ceased at the point of thematic saturation.
resultsThree key themes emerged: (1) perceptions of spirituality-nurses viewed spirituality as abstract and subjective, yet recognised religious rituals as visible signs of patients' emotional and spiritual needs. (2) Spiritual care in nursing-though seen as vital to holistic care, spiritual support was limited by privacy concerns and unclear professional boundaries. (3) Dynamics of spiritual care-delivery was shaped by institutional barriers, nurses' personal traits and patients' non-verbal communication of distress.
conclusionThis study revealed the views of general surgical nurses regarding spiritual care. The findings indicate that while nurses acknowledge the importance of spiritual care, they encounter obstacles in its implementation. Consequently, the results suggest that nurses need to be culturally sensitive and receive institutional support-particularly in collectivist and high-context cultures such as Turkey-in order to better understand and meet spiritual needs. Future studies should explore spiritual care models adapted to different cultural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.