Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41043832›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Development, validation and clinical utility of prognostic models for patients with traumatic brain injury in an Indian setting using machine learning and traditional approaches: a study protocol.

Vineet Kumar Kamal, Deepak Agrawal, Anil Kumar, Raghavendran Radhakrishnan, Manickam Ponnaiah, Deepana Ramaiya, Arumugam Thiruvalluvan, Aditya Sivaram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vineet Kumar KamalDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Kalyani, India vineet.biostat@aiimskalyani.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-1644
Deepak AgrawalDepartment of Neuro Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Anil KumarDepartment of Trauma and Emergency, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Patna, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8271-5784
Raghavendran RadhakrishnanInstitute of Neuro-Surgery, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
Manickam PonnaiahHealth Systems Research, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0797-0822
Deepana RamaiyaInfectious Disease Epidemiology, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
Arumugam ThiruvalluvanInstitute of Neuro-Surgery, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
Aditya SivaramInstitute of Neuro-Surgery, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major public health concern in India, with high mortality and long-term disability. Existing prognostic models, mostly developed in high-income countries using traditional methods, lack generalisability to the Indian context and do not use the potential of machine learning or multicentric data. This study primarily aims to develop, compare and validate machine learning methods, including the traditional approach, to predict 30-day mortality and 6-month functional outcomes in patients with moderate or severe TBI. A secondary objective is to describe and compare admission characteristics and outcomes (at discharge, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year) in TBI patients in tertiary care settings using descriptive analyses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Data from the neurotrauma registry at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, department of neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, including patients admitted between 23 March 2022 and 22 September 2024, will be used for model development and internal validation. For external validation, retrospectively collected data from the same centre (May 2010 to August 2013) and prospectively collected data from AIIMS Patna (1 June 2022 to 30 November 2024) and Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College (MMC), Chennai (1 May 2022 to 31 October 2024) will be included. Prediction models for 30-day mortality and 6-month functional outcomes will be developed using both machine learning and traditional statistical techniques. Model performance will be evaluated based on discrimination, calibration and clinical utility, with the latter assessed through decision curve analysis (DCA). An online risk calculator will be developed based on the best-performing model to estimate outcome probabilities along with 95% CIs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The institutional Ethics Review Board of respective data collection centres, that is, AIIMS, New Delhi, AIIMS, Patna, and MMC, Chennai, approved the study. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at national and international conferences. DISCUSSION: This study will develop and validate prognostic models using traditional and machine learning methods tailored to the Indian TBI context. Multicentric, prospectively collected data will enhance generalisability, while clinical utility will be evaluated through DCA. Adherence to Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis + Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD+AI) guidelines ensures methodological transparency. With external validation, these models may improve clinical decision-making, resource planning and patient-family communication in diverse Indian healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticMachine LearningHumansIndiaPrognosisRegistriesResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEBrain InjuriesClinical ProtocolsINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID41043832
PMCPMC12496054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.