Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41043828›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Sources, topics and acquisition routes and timing of health information acquired by women and their partners in the perinatal and postpartum periods: a scoping review protocol.

Yuriko Tadokoro, Nozomi Sonoda, Kaori Takahata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuriko TadokoroChiba Faculty of Nursing, Tokyo Healthcare University, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan y-tadokoro@thcu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4074-4683
Nozomi SonodaFaculty of Nursing, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
Kaori TakahataSchool of Nursing, Shonan Kamakura University of Medical Sciences, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8141-3354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis for scoping reviews. We will search PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Ichushi (Japanese electronic database) for relevant articles. The search in Google will be for grey literature. We will include sources of evidence that were investigated after 2020 and written in English and Japanese. Article screening will be conducted by two independent reviewers and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review flow diagram. Results will be presented on tables and described narratively. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review covers only secondary data that are publicly available and therefore does not require ethical review approval. The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented in a conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000056170.

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorPostpartum PeriodSexual PartnersFemaleHumansPregnancyResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicHealth EducationOBSTETRICSPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPUBLIC HEALTHReview

Identifiers

PMID41043828
PMCPMC12496034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.