ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2025
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Screening of Equivocal Prostate Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Cases: Development and Validation of a Screening and Cancer Detection Framework.
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in prostate biopsy: diagnostic applications, risk stratification, and precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A foundation model-based multi-instance learning framework for accurate prediction of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer from whole slide images.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proposed as a solution to meet increasing demand for the diagnostic services of pathologists (B.I., C.F., V.M., B.G.N., X.J.Y.). Prostate biopsies are a significant source of this demand, and a substantial fraction of these biopsies require immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining, which adds work, time, and cost to the diagnostic process. Equivocal cases, which often prompt the use of IHC, not only present the greatest challenge to AI cancer detection tools but also represent the area where properly trained systems could offer the most clinical value by reducing the need for ancillary testing for cancer confirmation. From August 2021 to April 2023, we scanned 25,570 slides from 1641 patients. We investigated the performance of institutionally developed models for prostate cancer detection using digital pathology images, with an aim for reducing work, turnaround time, and costs related to the ordering of IHC equivocal cases. We advanced complementary sensitive and specific models to screen these challenging cases, aiming to identify slides that could be confidently diagnosed without any ancillary IHC tests. Additionally, we compared the performance of a prostate-specific model to a general-purpose foundation model for screening and cancer detection. Our screening models correctly classified 55% of challenging equivocal blocks where IHC was ordered with a 1.4% error rate. We found that the foundation model achieved higher screening rates (ie, percentage of cases where IHC could be avoided), but this came at the cost of uniformly higher error rates and significantly greater computational demands. When trained as a standalone prostate cancer detection system, our model demonstrated high concordance with pathologist ground truth, achieving an area under the curve of 98.5%, sensitivity of 95.0%, and specificity of 97.8%. Computational models can aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer and can effectively screen challenging prostate biopsy cases, reducing unnecessary IHC utilization and helping to optimize pathology workflows. Plain language summary Traditional pathologic diagnosis of prostate cancer can be labor intensive. Equivocal cases in particular often require special testing (immunohistochemistry [IHC]) to establish a diagnosis, which introduces further delay and cost. This study develops an artificial intelligence system specifically designed to screen equivocal cases and reduce the need for IHC. Our model serves as a second-read tool to help optimize pathology workflow and reduce turnaround time and costs by flagging cases where IHC can be safely avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.