ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
National Electronic Health Record Coverage in Pacific Island Countries and Territories: Environmental Scan.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPacific Island countries and territories (PICTs) face unique challenges in delivering health care and sustaining digital health systems. These challenges include geographically dispersed populations and service delivery points, workforce shortages, and poor infrastructure. National electronic health records (EHRs) can strengthen health systems by facilitating continuity of care but are only available in 47% of countries worldwide. The status of national EHRs in PICTs has not been previously described in the published literature.
objectiveThis study aimed to map national EHR coverage in 14 PICTs of the World Health Organization (WHO) Western Pacific Region classified as Small Island Developing States (SIDS). This included the presence or absence of a national EHR; identification of EHR software used; coverage nationally and across primary, secondary, and tertiary facilities; presence or absence of supporting digital health or health information system strategies and policies; comparison of national EHR coverage in PICTs with national EHR coverage globally; and exploration of a relationship between EHR coverage and country income in PICTs.
methodsGiven the absence of peer-reviewed literature on EHRs in PICTs, an environmental scan methodology was selected to review gray literature sources. We conducted a 3-stage environmental scan to systematically search publicly available websites across government, bilateral, multilateral, and philanthropic organizations for documents describing the status of national EHR implementations in the aforementioned 14 PICTs.
resultsOf the 14 PICTs assessed, 12 countries (86%) have an EHR implemented at some level of the public health system, and 8 (57%) have a single national system implemented at more than one facility. Although this is higher than national EHR coverage rates globally (57/122, 47%), average coverage across the 12 PICTs using EHRs was only 39% (median 16%). We also identified a positive relationship between EHR coverage and country income status and generally medium to high EHR coverage across tertiary hospitals (19/41, 46%) and secondary care facilities (29/77, 38%) but low implementation at primary care facilities (61/4158, 1.5%). EHR coverage across all facilities in the 14 countries assessed was 2.5% (108/4267). EHR software used includes Tamanu (Nauru, Palau, Samoa, Kiribati, Fiji [Aspen Medical public-private partnership hospitals]), Medtech (Cook Islands, Niue), Vesalius (Tonga), PATIS Plus (Fiji), and custom systems.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate, for the first time, that EHRs are being implemented in PICTs, including at scale in some settings. Despite high apparent coverage in some PICTs, the success of implementation and health worker usage remains unclear. Gray literature indicates that some EHRs currently available are failing or incapable of scaling nationally. To support sustainability of national EHRs in PICTs, governments should prioritize the implementation of fit-for-purpose, open-source, and scalable EHRs, and future studies should assess the success of EHR adoption and impact in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.