ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2026
Cognitive dedifferentiation in later life: longitudinal findings from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIn the cognitive aging literature, the dedifferentiation hypothesis refers to cognitive skills becoming more interrelated in older adulthood. Here, we report evidence for cognitive dedifferentiation in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936).
methodsThe LBC1936 is a narrow-age cohort assessed at 5 waves between ages 70 and 82. We analyzed data from 418 participants (49% male) who provided cognitive data at all 5 waves.
resultsIn single-order structural equation models, the percentage of variance that general cognitive functioning (g) accounted for across 13 cognitive tests increases by wave; w1 to w5: 25%, 27%, 29%, 31%, 36%, and the group-level rate of dedifferentiation closely tracked the group-level rate of cognitive decline (r = -.991, p = .001). A hierarchical model, which included 4 cognitive domains as mid-level factors, provides evidence of cognitive dedifferentiation at the cognitive domain level: fluid cognitive domains (Visuospatial Skills, Processing Speed, and Verbal Memory) converged, and Crystallised Ability became less influential on the structure of g over time. We also show that this group-level measure of dedifferentiation reflects the individual-level measure of dispersion (people tend to score more similarly across different cognitive tests with advancing age), r = -.989, p = .001. DISCUSSION: The current results have implications for longitudinal g modeling choices: it cannot be assumed that g's composition is the same over time. Future longitudinal research will be important in clarifying the incremental validity, determinants, mechanisms, and implications of cognitive differentiation and dedifferentiation across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.