Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042981›Full record

ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025

Dose of nursing intervention: repercussions for professional practice.

George Luiz Alves Santos, Thiago Augusto Soares Monteiro da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George Luiz Alves SantosCentro Universitário La Salle, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9614-2182
Thiago Augusto Soares Monteiro da SilvaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Escola de Enfermagem Anna Nery, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-5101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to understand the repercussions of the dose of nursing intervention for professional practice. This is a theoretical reflection study that sought to answer: what are the repercussions of the dose of nursing intervention for professional practice? To answer this question, a corpus of selected texts was considered that allowed us to understand such repercussions. The following repercussions were identified: the possibility of measuring the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments prescribed by nurses; the reduction of variability in prescribed actions; the construction of a more solid evidence base so that nurses, in different contexts, feel confident in taking responsibility for clinical outcomes in nursing; the greater replicability of actions in nursing intervention studies; the increased potential for replicability of treatments prescribed in similar situations, among others. The study's objective was achieved as it identified how the dose of nursing intervention affects professional practice, without which it is not possible to discuss the impacts of care on patients' clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

NursingProfessional PracticeHumans

Identifiers

PMID41042981
PMCPMC12494363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.