ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026
Health economic studies in clinical rehabilitation: A new collection of papers and a discussion of issues involved in research.
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote Multicomponent Rehabilitation and Cost-Effectiveness in Survivors of Critical Illness.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Cost-effectiveness of (sub)acute rehabilitation services for spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo review challenges associated with health economic studies in rehabilitation, providing a context for the new Clinical Rehabilitation collection of papers concerned with health economics.RehabilitationAnalysis of the health economic effects associated with rehabilitation must recognise that rehabilitation consists of both a problem-solving process that facilitates the person's adaptation by providing information, advice, and sometimes specific interventions targeting multiple areas. Second, it operates within a complex, adaptive system, specifically the biopsychosocial model of illness. Third, its goals are to enhance well-being and quality of life through its effects on lower-level systems. Consequently, the effects of rehabilitation are unpredictable and typically manifest in several domains. Comprehensive single or multiple focused outcome measures are needed. As evidence-based selection of people who might benefit from rehabilitation is impossible, evaluative studies should have broad inclusion criteria.SystemsRehabilitation is a healthcare service. Traditionally, it is delivered in series, after the biomedical treatment has ended. This allows researchers, including health economists, to isolate the influence of rehabilitation. However, it will be more effectively delivered in parallel, with biomedical care from the outset, as happens, for example, in trauma and intensive care units. Evaluating individual components of healthcare in isolation is unnecessary. Rehabilitation will always involve non-healthcare services. Conversely, the effects of rehabilitation may significantly reduce non-healthcare costs. This close interrelationship necessitates a societal perspective on the economics of rehabilitation.ConclusionsUsing a combination of a global, comprehensive clinical outcome measure and societal-level health economic data will increase the likelihood of detecting effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.