ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Quantifying and Utilizing Electroosmotic Flow for Mechanical Measurements with the Scanning Ion Conductance Microscope.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspective on Scanning Electrochemical Probe Microscopy in Single-Cell Imaging.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- A Correlative SICM-OPM Platform for Surface and Volumetric Imaging in Live Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Revealing physical properties of gastric adenocarcinoma cells with two distinct morphologies linking to preferential cellular migration and proliferation.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Applications of Nanopipettes in Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy for High-Spatial-Resolution Topographic Imaging and Sensing in Single Cells.ACS measurement science au · 2026Review
- A genetically encoded microtubule bundler for causal dissection of microtubule bundling in cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The scanning ion conductance microscope (SICM) is an emerging imaging technique for the investigation of delicate samples on the nanometer scale in liquid environments using ion current through a glass nanopipette. In recent years, the SICM has been increasingly applied to mechanical measurements, typically using a microfluidic flow in the nanopipette induced by hydrostatic pressure. Here, we introduce the use of electroosmotic flow (EOF) in mechanical SICM measurements. We show that the EOF in small SICM nanopipettes is comparable to the flow induced by commonly applied hydrostatic pressures. We quantify the electroosmotic mobility, which is a central parameter of EOF but strongly depends on experimental conditions, by measuring the streaming current independent of nanopipette geometry. Using decane microdroplets, we show that both EOF and hydrostatic pressure can be used to mechanically probe elastic samples on the nanometer scale. We then develop a numerical model to quantify the stiffness and the Young's modulus of elastic samples using EOF. Finally, we use EOF to map the Young's modulus of living cells, which gives similar results to the hydrostatic pressure method. We thereby demonstrate that EOF can be used to quantitatively probe sample stiffness with the SICM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.