Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042844›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

When crops fail, forests follow: Agricultural shocks and deforestation in Zambia.

Pablo J Ordóñez, Protensia Hadunka, Gemma Del Rossi, Kathy Baylis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pablo J Ordóñez *Inter-American Development Bank, Office of Strategic Planning and Development Effectiveness (SPD), Washington, DC 20577.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-7624
Protensia Hadunka *Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.ORCID 0000-0003-4183-125X
Gemma Del RossiBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93117.ORCID 0000-0002-1193-4744
Kathy BaylisDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93117.ORCID 0000-0001-9633-4766

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2439879National Science Foundation (NSF) BCS-1534544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As climate change makes agricultural production shocks more frequent and severe, it is vital to understand their effect on farmer welfare, land use, and deforestation. Theoretically, a change in agricultural productivity could increase or decrease deforestation by changing demand for agricultural land and/or through the consumption of forests as a coping strategy. This paper uses the introduction of a crop pest to sub-Saharan Africa to estimate the effect of a negative agricultural productivity shock on deforestation. Using primary household data, we first find that farmers who were exposed to higher levels of fall armyworm saw substantial decreases in yield and food security. Using estimates of fall armyworm suitability in conjunction with machine-learning models of maize yields and deforestation, we find that the introduction of the fall armyworm induced a doubling of the deforestation rate in Zambia in the 3 y following the outbreak. This increase was driven both by increased agricultural land expansion and increased charcoal production as a coping strategy. These responses vary substantially over space. More remote areas experienced 23% lower FAW-induced deforestation compared with the sample average, suggesting that farmers with access to maize and charcoal markets may have increased deforestation as a response. Wealthier areas were also less likely to deforest in response to FAW pressure. In sum, our results suggest that negative agricultural productivity shocks may lead to a negative climate feedback, with farmers engaging in emissions-increasing strategies in response.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesCrops, AgriculturalForestsAnimalsClimate ChangeFarmersHumansZambiaZea maysagricultural productivitycharcoaldeforestationfall armywormZambia

Identifiers

PMID41042844
PMCPMC12519083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.