Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042825›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025

A Moment Versus a Lifetime: Patterns of Loneliness and Perceived Causes in People's Lived Experiences.

Luzia Cassis Heu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Luzia Cassis HeuDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3353-1054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For effective loneliness interventions, we need a better understanding of why some loneliness experiences persist (often labeled chronic loneliness), while most loneliness experiences remain transient. To provide starting points for future research on causes of chronic loneliness, interview data from adults ages 19-45 years from India, Egypt, Turkey, Israel, Bulgaria, and Austria were reanalyzed. Because of little scientific consensus on the exact definition of chronic versus transient loneliness, different temporal patterns of loneliness were first distinguished in the data. Instead of two, four types emerged: Transient loneliness typically lasted some hours to 2 years; recurrent loneliness recurred every couple of weeks or months; prolonged loneliness lasted for multiple years; and chronic loneliness usually had its onset in childhood or adolescence and persisted for most people's lives. Perceived causes for loneliness were compared across those four temporal patterns, with findings showing that transient or prolonged loneliness was typically attributed to concrete external situations, but chronic loneliness was explained more by unfulfilling family relationships in childhood, perceptions that one does not fit in with societal norms, or high relationship expectations. Both recurrent and chronic loneliness were often attributed to sensitivity, rumination, overgeneralizations in relationships, or discomfort with oneself (e.g., low self-acceptance).

Indexed as

LonelinessAdultAustriaBulgariaEgyptFemaleHumansIndiaIsraelMaleMiddle AgedTurkeyYoung Adultattachmentchronic lonelinesshypervigilancelonelinesssocial sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID41042825
PMCPMC12645267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.