ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
The probability of Plasmodium vivax acute illness following primary infection and relapse in Papua New Guinea.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inoculation with Plasmodium vivax malaria parasites can lead to blood-stage infections from the primary infection and relapses from liver-stage parasites or non-circulating merozoites. Understanding the risk of clinical illness following primary infection and relapse would inform surveillance and intervention strategies, but the probabilities are uncertain in people living in endemic areas. A major difficulty lies in the inability to distinguish primary infections and relapses. In this study, we estimate the probabilities of clinical illness using the different seasonal patterns of primary infection and relapse. Children aged one to three years in Ilaita, Papua New Guinea, were followed up over 16 months for illness (fever with ≥500 parasites/µl) with fortnightly active and passive case detection, and for blood-stage infection every two months. Estimates of the number of primary infections and relapses for each two-month time-period, age-group, village and ITN use category were derived from previous analyses using genotyping data. In this study, we use a Bayesian statistical model to relate the number of observed P. vivax clinical cases in each covariate category to the expected numbers of primary infections and relapses. We include the cumulative number of primary infections experienced since birth as a proxy for acquired immunity. To reflect uncertainty, we use varying assumptions about whether relapses can cause illness in different circumstances. The probability of illness decayed exponentially with increasing cumulative numbers of primary infections experienced. The estimated probability of illness following relapses was lower than that for primary infection, how much lower depended on how they were defined. Later relapses within the same brood tended to have lower probabilities than earlier ones. Varying seasonally, relapses were estimated to contribute half of P. vivax illness in this cohort despite accounting for 80% of the force of blood-stage infection. The results can inform estimates of the burden of P. vivax and provide building blocks for mathematical models for predicting the impact of interventions. Interventions triggered by clinical cases would focus on more recent infections and age-groups with less acquired immunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.