ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2025
CORP: In vivo muscle strength-perspectives on the design and interpretation of preclinical animal studies.
Review in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Running-based rehabilitation does not improve muscle function after volumetric muscle loss despite improving hindlimb weight-bearing asymmetry in mice.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Beyond the first bout: Adaptations to repeated injuries across physiological and pathological conditions.Physiological reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and reproducible tools to evaluate skeletal muscle contractility help to advance the field of physiology by defining skeletal muscle function in the context of skeletal muscle development, disease, aging, and injury recovery. The biomechanical assessment of muscle strength can be accomplished by measuring in vivo muscle torque, specifically, the muscle force generated at a moment arm around a joint. This approach to assess skeletal muscle contractility in preclinical animal studies primarily measures muscle torque in anesthetized animals using noninvasive electrophysiological stimulation. This method is advantageous because skeletal muscle contractions are evoked in a controlled, quantifiable manner that is independent of subject motivation, allowing for maximal functional data and reproducible research outcomes. The purpose of this Cores of Reproducibility in Physiology (CORP) review is to discuss the underlying physiology of the in vivo method, to highlight common outcomes and their physiological importance, and to provide considerations for technical reproducibility and data interpretation. The hope is this CORP will provide skeletal muscle researchers with the foundational and practical knowledge to better incorporate the in vivo technique in their future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.