ArticlePLoS genetics2025
Towards a transcriptomic biomarker for the classification of melanocytic neoplasms.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Histopathologic diagnosis of thin, invasive cutaneous melanoma (CM) is only 34-62% accurate. Therefore, we sought to develop a transcriptomic biomarker to distinguish benign from malignant melanocytic neoplasms. We generated a targeted RNA-Sequencing dataset (TempO-Seq) of benign nevi (BN; n = 50) and CM (Breslow depth ≤ 1.0 mm; n = 51) and demonstrated enrichment of immune-related pathways among the 450 differentially expressed genes. Next, we trained a putative transcriptomic biomarker in two datasets, including BN and CM, and one dataset with CM in association with a nevus, macrodissected into CM and nevus regions. We refer to the nevus portion of CM in association with a nevus as progressing nevi (PN), since these nevi progressed to CM. Principal component analysis showed that PN samples clustered in a component intermediate to BN and CM. Ordinal regularized regression selected PYGL, AP000845.1, PHYHIP, WSCD1, FBXO7, TRPM1, SLC4A4, NALCN, FRMD4B, HHATL, COL1A1, CRYM, EPOP, RGS1, KRT6C, IGHG1, CNTN1, MMP11, GZMM, AP001880.1, TTYH3, TMEM132A, and PRAME; these genes were consistently selected in 1000 models using data from bootstrap resamples and had a single model predictive accuracy of at least 0.90 (area under the receiver operator characteristics curve). Linear regression models fit with these 23 genes in the TempO-Seq data, and publicly available microarray datasets from BN, dysplastic nevi, and CM, showed high consistency in the magnitude and directionality of gene expression differences between nevi and CM. Furthermore, immunohistochemical staining showed consistent protein-level changes in MMP11 and PYGL. These results illuminate the potential for a transcriptomic biomarker to differentiate benign from malignant melanocytic neoplasms and improve the accuracy of melanoma diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.