Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042777›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Community wellbeing and lived experiences during urban redevelopment in New Zealand: Te Hotonga Hapori - Connecting communities qualitative study protocol.

Erica Hinckson, Vivienne Ivory, Julia McPhee, Megan Somerville Ryan, Moushumi Chaudhury, Lisa Mackay, Albert Refiti, Abby C King, Tania Ka'ai, Scott Duncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erica HincksonHuman Potential Centre, School of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3928-7830
Vivienne IvoryWSP Research & Innovation, Wellington, New Zealand.
Julia McPheeHuman Potential Centre, School of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Megan Somerville RyanHuman Potential Centre, School of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Moushumi ChaudhuryHuman Potential Centre, School of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lisa MackayHuman Potential Centre, School of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Albert RefitiVā Moana Research Cluster, Art and Design, Faculty of Design and Creative Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abby C KingDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Palo Alto, United States of America.
Tania Ka'aiTe Ipukarea Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Scott DuncanHuman Potential Centre, School of Sport, Exercise and Health, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8402-2930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cities around the world are growing rapidly, and the demand for housing is subsequently increasing. Many governments have initiated large-scale redevelopment projects to address the problem but planning and implementation can significantly impact the wellbeing of residents. Evidence has shown that people-centred urban planning and redevelopment, including walkable areas, natural environments, and appealing public spaces, can enhance physical, mental, and social wellbeing. The impact of these designs on wellbeing is complex, and without community involvement, there is a risk that redevelopment may not meet the wellbeing needs of the residents. Community Wellbeing and Lived Experiences study is part of Te Hotonga Hapori - Connecting Communities research programme which aims to provide the evidence to improve liveability and wellbeing in neighbourhoods that are undergoing redevelopment. It seeks to empower communities by involving them directly in the redevelopment process. Guided by the culturally informed Te Hotonga Hapori Engagement Framework it comprises 5 components: i) Active relationship building; ii) Historical/cultural realities; iii) Community aspirations; iv) Building bridges; and v) Activation of neighbourhood urban and natural environments. Data collection will be undertaken using the Community Science Aotearoa process that is contextually specific to communities in New Zealand and adapted from the Our Voice Citizen Science Research method. Residents using Te Hotonga Hapori app will collect photos and narratives and share information about their lived experiences during the redevelopment using a six-step process of Engage, Discover, Discuss, Advocate, Change and Re-engage. Descriptive statistics will be produced in relation to the number and typology of photos and narratives collected. Qualitative thematic analysis will be used for narrative data obtained from downloaded app data, and community and group sessions. Braun and Clarke's Thematic Analysis Framework will guide researchers through an iterative process and themes will be developed using the Attride-Stirling Thematic Networks Analytic Tool.

Indexed as

City PlanningResidence CharacteristicsUrban RenewalAdultCitiesCommunity ParticipationHumansNew ZealandQualitative ResearchUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID41042777
PMCPMC12494257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.