ArticlePloS one2025
Patterns and impacts of patient migration for primary knee arthroplasty in China: A national retrospective study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe phenomenon of interregional patient migration for primary knee arthroplasty (KA) appeared due to unbalanced distribution of medical resources. However, there is a paucity of literature about migration among patients receiving primary KA and the possible influence of migration on postoperative outcomes and financial burden. This study was aimed to investigate the characteristics of patient migration for KA in China and evaluate the related impacts.
methodsPrimary KAs performed between 2013 and 2018 were retrieved from the Hospital Quality Monitoring System in China. Cross-province (i.e., 31 provinces of mainland China) attendance for KA was assessed. Propensity score-matched analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of migration on postoperative outcomes and financial burden.
resultsA total of 168,693 primary KA patients were included during the study period. The migration rate decreased from 17.6% in 2013 to 7.6% in 2018 (P < 0.001). Migration occurred more frequently in patients with fewer comorbidities. Migrating patients tended to choose provincial hospitals and hospitals with high procedure volumes. Beijing and Shanghai were the most preferred destinations. After matching, there were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, wound infection, or 30-day readmission between two groups. The migration group had much higher total hospital charges.
conclusionA noticeable number of patients required cross-province migration to get access to KA. Migration didn't make a big difference but caused a greater financial burden. It is imperative to take initiatives to reduce disparities in resource allocation instead of relying on cross-district access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.