ArticlePloS one2025
Evaluation of the antidiarrheal activity of dichloromethane-methanol crude extract of the aerial parts of Croton kinondoensis (Euphorbiaceae) in Mice.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Phytochemical profiling and pharmacological evaluation ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- African traditional medicine: historical legacy, colonial disruption, and pathways for integration into modern healthcare.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiarrhea remains a major global health concern, particularly in developing countries. Resistance to conventional antibiotics underscores the need for effective, plant-based alternatives. Croton kinondoensis, a traditional Kenyan remedy for gastrointestinal ailments, has yet to be scientifically validated. This study assessed its antidiarrheal and antimotility effects in vivo mouse models.
methodsLeaf extracts were prepared using dichloromethane/methanol (1:1). Phytochemical screening confirmed the presence of flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids and phenolics. Acute toxicity was assessed via OECD guideline 425. Antidiarrheal activity was tested using a castor oil-induced diarrhea model, and gastrointestinal motility was evaluated using the charcoal meal test. Mice were divided into five groups (n = 6): negative control (distilled water), positive control (loperamide 3 mg/kg), and three test groups receiving C. kinondoensis extract at doses of 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg). Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test to determine significance (p < 0.05).
resultsThe extract showed no toxicity at 2000 mg/kg. In the castor oil-induced diarrhea model, the C. kinondoensis extract at 400 mg/kg inhibited diarrhea by 25.57% (p < 0.05), compared to 71.43% inhibition by loperamide (p < 0.001) e. The charcoal meal transit test, 400 mg/kg of the extract reduced intestinal transit by 27.98% (p < 0.01), compared to 33.43% by loperamide (p < 0.001.
conclusionC. kinondoensis exhibits dose-dependent antidiarrheal and antimotility effects, supporting its traditional use. Although its efficacy was lower than loperamide, the extract demonstrated significant potential as a natural remedy for diarrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.