ArticlePloS one2025
Development and validation of a risk predication model for nutritional risk based on water swallowing test in post-stroke with dysphagia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop and validate a prediction model for nutritional risk in Post-Stroke Dysphagia (PSD). This study retrospectively analyzed data on stroke patients with dysphagia from January 2022 to December 2023. A stepwise logistic regression model was used to construct the prediction model, and internal validation was performed using the bootstrap resampling (1000 iterations), the nomogram was developed for clinical applications. The final prediction model incorporated the following factors: age, marital status, mechanical ventilation, dysphagia treatment, fasting duration, atrial fibrillation, oral care frequency, serum potassium levels, and National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score. The model demonstrated strong discriminatory power, with area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.916 in the development set and 0.878 in the validation set. Calibration curves and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test further confirmed the strong correlation between predicted and observed nutritional risks.The prediction model developed in this study exhibits high accuracy, consistency, and practical applicability, making it a valuable tool for predicting nutritional risk in PSD patients. The code library: https://osf.io/p3hjm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.