ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of functional and technical quality on patient satisfaction in prosthetic and orthotic care: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing lower-limb prosthetic users with the amputee mobility predictor with prosthesis and timed up and go tests.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Observational
- Assessing Lower-Limb Prosthetic Users with the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale-Revised: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient satisfaction with prosthetic and orthotic services is shaped by both functional quality, such as communication and service accessibility, and technical quality, including device durability and usability. This study examined how these dimensions are associated with patient satisfaction in diverse healthcare settings in Jordan, a low- to middle-income country. A cross-sectional survey of 307 users from government, military, private, and non-governmental (NGO) providers was conducted using a 28-item questionnaire developed from existing literature. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling confirmed the scale's validity and tested associations between variables. Both functional quality (β = 0.521, p < 0.001) and technical quality (β = 0.382, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with satisfaction, with functional quality showing a stronger influence. NGO users reported the highest satisfaction scores, and the model explained 41.7% of the variance in satisfaction. ANOVA results revealed statistically significant differences among provider types. These findings highlight the value of patient-centered care and suggest that enhancing communication, accessibility, and service responsiveness may improve satisfaction, particularly in public and private sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.