ReviewEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology2025
Ethnic disparities in prevalence and screening rates of sexually transmitted infections.
Review in European journal of microbiology & immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Sexually Transmitted Infection Treatment Rates Among Pregnant vs Nonpregnant Patients in Emergency Departments.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a major global health concern, with certain ethnic communities being disproportionately affected. This review summarizes recent evidence of ethnic disparities in STI prevalence and screening rates, with most data originating from the United States. The findings confirm the fact that certain ethnic communities such as Black and Hispanic display higher prevalence rates of STIs. Yet the data on screening behavior reveal a striking contradiction. While some studies report lower testing rates among these communities, others demonstrate that Black and Hispanic individuals reported the highest testing engagement compared to other ethnic groups. If testing behavior alone explained these disparities, a clearer correlation between screening and infection rates would be expected. Instead, that paradox might suggest a complex interplay with additional factors included in this review such as, for example, institutional racism, socioeconomic inequalities, differences in sexual and healthcare-seeking behavior, traumatic experiences, and limited access to healthcare. In conclusion, given the global burden caused by STIs, the ongoing health disparities in many parts of the world indicate an urgent need for further investigations into the mechanisms behind these disparities and to identify factors that yet may have been overlooked.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.