ArticleJAMA health forum2025
Global Disparities in Premature Mortality.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Persistent disparities in mortality across countries suggest uneven improvements in living standards and access to life-extending health technologies, as well as context-specific obstacles. Studies have analyzed cross-country inequality in mortality but have not widely contextualized those disparities in terms of developmental progress relative to a frontier representing a level of mortality achievable with broad access to the best health-enhancing technology and living standards available. Objective: To examine probability of premature death (PPD)-defined as probability of dying before 70 years of age-across countries and regions, benchmarking progress as years behind the lowest country-level PPD (the frontier). Design and Setting: This cross-sectional study used aggregate-level data from the 2024 United Nations World Population Prospects and Human Mortality Database to calculate PPD across 7 global regions and the 30 most populous countries. Data were analyzed from May to September 2025. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcomes were PPD and the number of years behind the lowest country-level PPD. Results: The frontier PPD fell from 57% to 12% from 1900 to 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa's PPD in 2019 was 52%, corresponding to the 1916 frontier PPD. However, sub-Saharan Africa had converged toward the frontier by over 40 years since 2000, when it had a 65% PPD. China has been converging toward the frontier since 1970, having been 93 years behind the frontier PPD in 1970 (with a 60% PPD) and 35 years behind in 2019 (21% PPD). The US has diverged away from the frontier, having been 29 years behind in 1970 (38% PPD) and 38 years in 2019 (22% PPD). Of the regions included, the North Atlantic (Western Europe and Canada) was the closest to the frontier, being 13 years behind in 2019 (15% PPD). The US, Central and Eastern Europe, and sub-Saharan Africa were the furthest above the 2019 PPD Preston curve (ie, they had a greater PPD than predicted by their per capita gross domestic product). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, disparities in PPD were likely to reflect major inequality in access to health-enhancing technologies and living standards, as well as context-specific obstacles. Technological and medical advancements leading to universal health benefits need to be rapidly and fairly disseminated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.