Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042525›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

US Antibiotic Importation and Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

Mariana P Socal, Yunxiang Sun, Jeromie M Ballreich, Jennifer Dailey Lambert, Tinglong Dai, Maqbool Dada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariana P SocalDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yunxiang SunDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jeromie M BallreichDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jennifer Dailey LambertJohns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland.
Tinglong DaiJohns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, Maryland.
Maqbool DadaJohns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The US has faced persistent antibiotic shortages over the past decade, compromising patient care, public health, and national security. Understanding the global sources of US antibiotic imports is critical to inform policies to improve supply chain resilience. Objective: To identify the global sources of US antibiotic imports, focusing on finished dosage forms (FDFs) and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) between 1992 and 2024. Design and Setting: This cross-sectional study of US antibiotic importation records used data from USA Trade Online from January 1992 to July 2024. Data included import volumes, costs, and the originating country. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trends in annual import volumes for antibiotic FDFs and APIs (metric tons), spending and price per kilogram (inflation-adjusted dollars), and market concentration measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). An HHI less than 1500 indicates an unconcentrated (ie, competitive) market, 1500 to 2500 indicates a moderate concentration, and greater than 2500 indicates high concentration. Results: The final sample included 50 FDF-originating countries and 52 API-originating countries. Compared with the annual volume of US antibiotic FDF imports in 1992, the annual volume in 2024 increased 2595.0%, while the annual volume of API imports remained relatively stable. Mean inflation-adjusted importation prices for FDFs decreased from $1836.03 per kg in 1992 to $177.44 per kg in 2024. For APIs, mean prices decreased from $351.74 per kg in 2003 to $65.69 per kilogram in 2024. From 2020 to 2024, India was the leading originating country for FDFs (31.9% of the total imported volume and 18.2% of the total imported cost), followed by Italy (13.4% of the total volume and 22.4% of the total cost). China was the leading originating country for APIs (62.6% of the total imported volume and 28.7% of the total cost), followed by Bulgaria (16.1% of the total volume and 3.8% of the total cost). Italy was the originating country for 2.6% of API imported volume but accounted for 27.9% of the importation costs. HHI revealed that FDF importation has become unconcentrated since 2020 (HHI, 1500-2500), while API importation markets are highly concentrated (2024 HHI, >5000). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that US antibiotic importation relies on diversified global sources for FDFs but primarily on China for APIs. Policies to strengthen domestic production and diversify sourcing are critical to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities. Improved traceability and targeted strategies for specific antibiotics are recommended to safeguard public health and national security.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCommerceCross-Sectional StudiesDrug CostsDrug IndustryHumansUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID41042525
PMCPMC12495497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.