ArticleJAMA network open2025
AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism: A Trial Protocol.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06939803 (AI-driven Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
AI-driven Clinical Decision Support to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence into venous thromboembolism care: Predictive models, implementation challenges, and future directions.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Venous Thromboembolism Prevention: A Narrative Review of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Natural Language Processing.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Bridging practice and evidence: insights from the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and Saudi Critical Care Society Guidelines on trauma-related VTE.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) remains a leading cause of preventable death among hospitalized adults in the US. Despite numerous attempts to prognosticate HA-VTE with risk models, no single model has outperformed the rest, and the effectiveness of such models to drive prophylaxis decisions is unknown. Testing such systems in urban and rural settings may inform their generalizability. Objective: To conduct a randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven clinical decision support (CDS) in reducing HA-VTE incidence in adults across urban and rural hospital settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel-group, single-blind, pragmatic randomized clinical trial is planned to be conducted from October 1, 2025, through September 30, 2027, by the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, a major academic health system in Tennessee. The study population will include adult (aged ≥18 years) patients admitted to medical, surgical, and intensive care units who may be at high risk for VTE and with no active or contraindication to deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis at Vanderbilt Adult Hospital in urban Nashville and 3 affiliated hospitals serving rural communities in Middle Tennessee. Intervention: Patients will be randomized 1:1 within the electronic health record to receive either VTE-AI-driven CDS (nudge practice alert [intervention arm]) or standard care using traditional risk assessment (control arm). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome will be incidence of HA-VTE. Secondary trial outcomes will be process metrics, including length of stay, readmission rates, safety, and bleeding events. Outcomes will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and compared using Poisson regression. Discussion: Using a validated prognostic model, this study is one of the first to provide insights into whether AI-driven CDS can effectively reduce HA-VTE incidence without increasing adverse events. This study also is intended to provide insights into the usefulness of the same AI model implemented across urban and rural settings. The study's findings and statistical code will be shared with the public through peer-reviewed publication and ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06939803.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.