Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042509›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Support for Alcohol Control Policies Among US Alcohol Consumers.

Anna H Grummon, Carolyn Chelius, Cristina J Y Lee, Aline D'Angelo Campos, Noel T Brewer, Allison J Lazard, Callie Whitesell, Thomas K Greenfield, Marissa G Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna H GrummonDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Carolyn CheliusDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Cristina J Y LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Aline D'Angelo CamposCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Noel T BrewerDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Allison J LazardLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Callie WhitesellDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Thomas K GreenfieldAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California.
Marissa G HallDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Informing alcohol policy: The impact of evidence-based alcohol warnings on consumptionR01AA030548 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Anna H Grummon, Marissa Hall · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA030548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Alcohol control policies are associated with lower alcohol-related disability and death. Policymakers are more likely to adopt policies with higher public support, but it remains unknown which alcohol control policies currently garner the most public support in the US. Objective: To determine the extent to which US adults who consume alcohol support alcohol control policies and whether support differs by behavioral and demographic characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional, online survey study of a nationally representative sample of US adults was conducted from September to October 2024. Adults aged 21 years or older who reported drinking at least 1 alcoholic beverage per week during the past 4 weeks were eligible. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was support for alcohol control policies (eg, requiring cancer warnings on alcohol containers or increasing alcohol taxes) measured on a 1 (strongly oppose) to 5 (strongly support) response scale. Associations of behavioral and demographic characteristics with policy support were estimated using average differential effects (ADEs; ie, differences in estimated mean overall support between groups on the 1-5 scale) were calculated. Results: A total of 1036 participants completed the survey (524 men [weighted percentage, 52%]; mean [SD] age, 49.4 [16.5] years; 138 [weighted percentage, 12%) Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish; 115 [weighted percentage, 11%] Black or African American; 681 [weighted percentage, 65%] White). Approximately one-half supported policies requiring alcohol containers to display cancer warnings (49%; 95% CI, 45% to 53%), drinks per container information (51%; 95% CI, 47% to 55%), and calorie content information (56%; 95% CI, 52%-60%). Likewise, 52% (95% CI, 48% to 56%) supported prohibiting alcohol advertisements on television when children are likely to be watching. Few participants (8% [95% CI, 6% to 11%] to 19% [95% CI, 16% to 23%]) opposed these policies. By contrast, fewer participants supported than opposed policies to lower the blood alcohol content limit for driving, prohibit alcohol sales late at night, and increase taxes on alcohol (range supporting: 16% [95% CI, 13% to 19%] to 25% [95% CI, 22% to 29%]); support was lowest for policies to reduce the number of outlets licensed to sell alcohol (10% [95% CI, 8% to 13%]). Across policies, support was greater among adults who reported drinking less often (ADE = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.02); not binge drinking (ADE = -0.15; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.04); or reading the current alcohol health warning in the last 30 days (ADE = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.28); and among those who were women (ADE = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11-0.32); Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish (ADE = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.001-0.33); Democrats (ADE = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.01-0.27); or political independents (ADE = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.29). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of US adults who consume alcohol, many supported advertising and labeling alcohol control policies, and few opposed these policies. These results suggest that policymakers may wish to pursue advertising and labeling policies as a ground-softening strategy to build support for stronger policies such as increasing taxes or restricting the times and places alcohol can be sold.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41042509
PMCPMC12495495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.