ArticleJAMA network open2025
Support for Alcohol Control Policies Among US Alcohol Consumers.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First Survey of Non-Alcoholic Beer Labels by Producer Type.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Alcohol control policies are associated with lower alcohol-related disability and death. Policymakers are more likely to adopt policies with higher public support, but it remains unknown which alcohol control policies currently garner the most public support in the US. Objective: To determine the extent to which US adults who consume alcohol support alcohol control policies and whether support differs by behavioral and demographic characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional, online survey study of a nationally representative sample of US adults was conducted from September to October 2024. Adults aged 21 years or older who reported drinking at least 1 alcoholic beverage per week during the past 4 weeks were eligible. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was support for alcohol control policies (eg, requiring cancer warnings on alcohol containers or increasing alcohol taxes) measured on a 1 (strongly oppose) to 5 (strongly support) response scale. Associations of behavioral and demographic characteristics with policy support were estimated using average differential effects (ADEs; ie, differences in estimated mean overall support between groups on the 1-5 scale) were calculated. Results: A total of 1036 participants completed the survey (524 men [weighted percentage, 52%]; mean [SD] age, 49.4 [16.5] years; 138 [weighted percentage, 12%) Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish; 115 [weighted percentage, 11%] Black or African American; 681 [weighted percentage, 65%] White). Approximately one-half supported policies requiring alcohol containers to display cancer warnings (49%; 95% CI, 45% to 53%), drinks per container information (51%; 95% CI, 47% to 55%), and calorie content information (56%; 95% CI, 52%-60%). Likewise, 52% (95% CI, 48% to 56%) supported prohibiting alcohol advertisements on television when children are likely to be watching. Few participants (8% [95% CI, 6% to 11%] to 19% [95% CI, 16% to 23%]) opposed these policies. By contrast, fewer participants supported than opposed policies to lower the blood alcohol content limit for driving, prohibit alcohol sales late at night, and increase taxes on alcohol (range supporting: 16% [95% CI, 13% to 19%] to 25% [95% CI, 22% to 29%]); support was lowest for policies to reduce the number of outlets licensed to sell alcohol (10% [95% CI, 8% to 13%]). Across policies, support was greater among adults who reported drinking less often (ADE = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.02); not binge drinking (ADE = -0.15; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.04); or reading the current alcohol health warning in the last 30 days (ADE = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.28); and among those who were women (ADE = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11-0.32); Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish (ADE = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.001-0.33); Democrats (ADE = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.01-0.27); or political independents (ADE = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.29). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of US adults who consume alcohol, many supported advertising and labeling alcohol control policies, and few opposed these policies. These results suggest that policymakers may wish to pursue advertising and labeling policies as a ground-softening strategy to build support for stronger policies such as increasing taxes or restricting the times and places alcohol can be sold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.