Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042474›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025

How Many Blastocysts Are Needed for PGT-A to Benefit RPL Patients? A 7-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Jia Liao, Shiheng Zhu, Jinghan Wang, Xinyi Xue, Chunzi Lyu, Qian Zhang, Junhao Yan, Tianxiang Ni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jia LiaoState Key Laboratory of Rproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, 157, Jingliu Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Shiheng ZhuState Key Laboratory of Rproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, 157, Jingliu Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Jinghan WangState Key Laboratory of Rproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, 157, Jingliu Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Xinyi XueState Key Laboratory of Rproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, 157, Jingliu Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Chunzi LyuState Key Laboratory of Rproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, 157, Jingliu Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Qian ZhangState Key Laboratory of Rproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, 157, Jingliu Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Junhao YanState Key Laboratory of Rproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, 157, Jingliu Road, Jinan, 250012, China.
Tianxiang NiState Key Laboratory of Rproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Women, Children and Reproductive Health, Shandong University, 157, Jingliu Road, Jinan, 250012, China. tianxiangni907@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6184-2832

Funding

Fertility Research Program of Young and Middle-aged Physicians in 2023 of Beijing Health Promotion Association donated by Merck Serono Co., Ltd BJHPA-2023-SZHYXZHQN-010General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, The Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University, Taishan Scholars Program for Young Experts of Shandong Province 82171648General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, The Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University, Taishan Scholars Program for Young Experts of Shandong Province 82471701General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, The Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University, Taishan Scholars Program for Young Experts of Shandong Province 82471702; 2023QNTD004; tsqn202312388General Program of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China ZR2022MH087General Program of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China ZR2023MH171General Program of Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China ZR2024MH169National Key Research and Development Program, General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 2022YFA1103603National Key Research and Development Program, General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 2022YFC2703202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (uRPL) may vary according to the number of good-quality blastocysts available. This study is to determine whether PGT-A could improve the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) among couples experiencing uRPL as the number of high-quality blastocysts increases. A retrospective study involving 1073 couples with uRPL was conducted at a university-affiliated reproductive center. Patients were divided into two groups: 813 participants who underwent PGT-A and 260 participants who underwent conventional in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). A stratified analysis was conducted, which categorized the female participants into three subgroups based on the number of high-quality blastocysts: 1-3, 4-6, and ≥ 7. A binary logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations between the number of high-quality blastocysts and the cumulative pregnancy outcomes. Among uRPL patients undergoing PGT-A or IVF/ICSI, there were respectively 421 vs. 129 with 1-3 blastocysts, 252 vs. 69 with 4-6 blastocysts, and 140 vs. 62 with ≥ 7 blastocysts. In 1-3 blastocysts subgroup, CLBR was 23.52% after PGT-A vs. 33.33% after IVF/ICSI (adjusted OR 1.005, 95% CI 0.604-1.674, p = 0.984). In 4-6 blastocysts subgroup, CLBR was 53.17% after PGT-A vs. 75.36% after IVF/ICSI (adjusted OR 0.398, 95% CI 0.197-0.802, p = 0.010). In ≥ 7 blastocysts subgroup, CLBR was 73.57% after PGT-A vs. 66.13% after IVF/ICSI (adjusted OR 1.660, 95% CI 0.729-3.799, p = 0.227). In these three subgroups, clinical pregnancy loss rates were all similar between the two treatment methods. In women with uRPL, PGT-A did not improve CLBR, irrespective of the number of high-quality blastocysts available. Routine use of PGT-A in this population is therefore not recommended. Future high-quality randomized controlled trials may better define its appropriate indications.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualAneuploidyBlastocystGenetic TestingPreimplantation DiagnosisAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthMalePregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicBlastocyst numberCumulative live birth ratePreimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidyRecurrent pregnancy loss

Identifiers

PMID41042474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.