ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Outcome and predictors of response to vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of time to palliative epilepsy surgery on outcomes.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Holistic management of epilepsy in adults with intellectual development disorders.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Article
- Trigeminal neuralgia-like pain in a vagus nerve stimulationEpilepsy & behavior reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been used as an adjunctive therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) for decades. Nonetheless, the predictors of response to VNS remain inadequately characterized. We aimed to find factors associated with responder status. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who received VNS for DRE in our medical center between 2000 and 2023. Preoperative data and VNS parameters were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analysis to identify predictors associated with responder status. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to select possible related factors and the cutoff values. The overall responder rate was 35.8%. Individuals with generalized epilepsy demonstrated significantly higher responder rates (86%) compared to those with focal (29%) or combined epilepsy (28%). Univariate analysis indicated that an epilepsy duration of < 5 years at the time of VNS implantation (p = 0.021) and a diagnosis of generalized epilepsy (p = 0.016) were associated with a favorable response. A multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed these findings. There was no correlation between age at implantation, prior epilepsy surgery, VNS parameters, such as output current and duty cycle, and the responder status. An epilepsy duration of < 5 years at VNS implantation and generalized epilepsy are independent predictors of responder status to VNS. Future long-term, randomized controlled trials with larger cohorts are needed to better evaluate these critical variables and their association with VNS outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.