ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025
Robotic adrenalectomy: a comprehensive review of perioperative outcomes, comparative efficacy, and technological advancements.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Single-Port Robotic Adrenalectomy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Review
- Transition to robotic adrenalectomy: a surgeon-specific learning curve evaluation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adrenal glands are small but vital endocrine organs responsible for hormone production, which is essential for stress response, fluid balance, and blood pressure regulation. Adrenalectomy, the surgical removal of one or both adrenal glands, is indicated in various benign and malignant conditions such as pheochromocytomas, aldosterone-producing adenomas, and adrenocortical carcinoma. Historically performed via open surgery, adrenalectomy has evolved significantly with the introduction of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in the 1990s and more recently, robotic adrenalectomy. Robotic adrenalectomy enhances surgical precision through 3D visualization, articulated instruments, and improved ergonomics, thereby addressing the limitations inherent to laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This narrative review synthesises the findings from pivotal studies that compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic adrenalectomy and laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Robotic adrenalectomy demonstrates favourable outcomes in terms of operative precision, reduced estimated blood loss, and comparable or shorter hospital stay, especially in complex scenarios involving obesity, large tumours, or altered anatomy. Complication rates remain low, and R0 resection rates exceed 95% in well-selected malignancies, supporting the oncological adequacy of robotic adrenalectomies. While robotic adrenalectomy offers superior surgeon ergonomics and a relatively short learning curve, its high initial costs and lack of tactile feedback present notable limitations. Technological advancements, including high-definition 3D optics, fluorescence imaging, and artificial intelligence integration, have further refined the potential of robotic adrenalectomies. However, the evidence remains largely retrospective, with limited prospective randomised trials evaluating long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Robotic adrenalectomy appears to be particularly advantageous in complex adrenal cases, offering a safe, minimally invasive option with the potential for improved recovery and surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on the long-term oncologic efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and economic sustainability of robotic adrenalectomy in diverse clinical settings. Robotic adrenalectomy represents a significant milestone in adrenal surgery, with growing evidence supporting its selective use as a preferred approach in experienced centres and in appropriately chosen patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41042457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.