ArticleBiological trace element research2026
Arsenic Poisoning in Bihar: A Comparative Health Risk Assessment Through Water and Food Sources.
Article in Biological trace element research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arsenic poisoning from groundwater has caused serious health hazards to the exposed population globally. The human body is contaminated by arsenic through drinking water and food, causing skin manifestations, neurological disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, cancer, etc. In the present study, a total of n = 286 household handpump water samples and food consumed (wheat and rice) by the studied subjects and each household member's biological samples (hair and nail) were collected for arsenic quantification. The hazard quotient (HQ) and cancer risk (CR) study was evaluated in the exposed studied population from the consumed wheat and rice. Arsenic content in 14% of water samples, 44% of wheat samples, and 3% of rice samples have exceeded their respective permissible limits of 10 μg/L, 100 μg/kg, and 200 μg/kg. In the studied subjects, 69% had arsenic contamination in their hair samples more than the permissible limit (200 μg/kg), while 11% had arsenic contamination in their nail samples more than the permissible limit (500 μg/kg). Arsenic contamination in the participants' household water, hair, and nail samples was positively correlated with one another by a correlation coefficient study. The food samples showed a significant correlation between the subjects' hair and nail samples and rice and wheat. In the six districts of Bihar, the geospatial analysis of all the variables revealed a considerable level of arsenic contamination. The health risk assessment also showed a high risk of arsenic contamination through wheat rather than rice. The risk assessment revealed elevated hazard quotient (HQ) and cancer risk (CR) in the six districts of Bihar's arsenic-exposed population. The present study thus concludes that arsenic contamination in water and food grains is causing health hazards in the studied exposed population of Bihar. Therefore, there is an urgent need to initiate an effective mitigation plan to safeguard the health of the exposed population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41042437What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.