SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Comparative Cleansing Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Bowel Preparation Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Network and Proportional Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnesium: Hype and Health Benefits.Current nutrition reports · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsEfficient bowel preparation is essential for high-quality visualization and lesion detection during colonoscopy. In children, bowel cleansing is often challenging due to age-related physiology, poor palatability of agents, and low tolerability. The optimal regimen remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bowel-cleansing agents in children.
methodsWe conducted a network and proportional meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved through May 2025 from PubMed and Embase. The primary outcome was bowel cleansing efficacy, measured by validated preparation scales. Secondary outcomes included safety and tolerability. Polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) served as the reference comparator.
resultsTwenty RCTs (2,468 subjects) were included. Polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG-3350 or Miralax) demonstrated the highest cleansing efficacy (92.3%). Other regimens, including PEG-ELS + bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate, PEG-ELS + enema, PEG-ELS + ascorbic acid, and normal saline, also achieved adequate bowel preparation (> 80%) in the proportional meta-analysis; however, the latter two were evaluated in single studies. The network meta-analysis of safety outcomes revealed no significant differences in abdominal pain among agents. Furthermore, sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate exhibited the lowest rates of nausea/vomiting and ranked highest in tolerability. Notably, the two small RCTs evaluating PEG-3350 (Miralax) reported safety outcomes but did not include tolerability data.
conclusionSodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate offers the most favorable balance of efficacy, safety, and tolerability for pediatric colonoscopy preparation. PEG-3350 (Miralax) may be considered when maximized cleansing is the goal, but additional efficacy and tolerability data in children are needed. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024508556.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41042416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.