Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042402›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Evaluating the prognosis of prostate cancer through metabolic pathways.

Qiang Su, Yi Hu, Bin Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qiang SuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Yuquan Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100040, China. suqiang@buaa.edu.cn.
Yi HuBiomedical Innovation Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China.
Bin DaiNeurosurgery department, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100038, China. daibinlhy@163.com.

Funding

High-level public health technical personnel construction Project training plan of Beijing Subject leader-03-25Medical and Health Program of China Railway J2023Z608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pathogenesis of prostate cancer (PCa) is strongly influenced by metabolism. Thus, we explored candidate genes with metabolism-related functions that can be used to predict PCa prognosis.

methodsTo create a training set and two validation sets, RNA data and clinical parameters were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Risk score (RS) was constructed based on metabolism-related gene signatures. The predictive power of the RS was evaluated. A nomogram related to biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) was built and evaluated. Finally, an enrichment analysis using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed to identify enriched Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) categories. The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) platform was employed to identify the expression of important genes at the protein level.

resultsFive gene signatures from 860 metabolism-related genes were selected. RS were constructed using the five-gene signatures, which showed high prognostic power for biochemical recurrence (BCR). The nomogram effectively predicted BCRFS. According to GO analysis, DNA damage is primarily associated with genes involved in metabolism. The five-gene signatures were primarily enriched in sulfur metabolic pathways, as analyzed by KEGG. With the progression of prostate cancer malignancy, the expression of HAGHL, and INPP5E also increased.

conclusionThe study establishes a robust, metabolism-based prognostic model for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Biochemical relapseMetabolic gene signatureNomogramProgressionProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID41042402
PMCPMC12495006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.