ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Team-based learning curve and cost efficiency in robot-assisted hysterectomy: a four-phase CUSUM study of 915 cases.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic versus open (or laparoscopic) hysterectomy: a comprehensive review of clinical, surgical, and economic outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Perioperative outcomes and learning curves of minimally invasive hysterectomy: a comparative analysis of MPLH, RASPH, and SPLH.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approaches: Comparative Learning Curves and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus V-NOTES Techniques.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Team learning may influence both efficiency and hospital margins in robot-assisted hysterectomy (RAH), yet phase-specific economic data remain limited. We analyzed 915 consecutive RAHs (single-center, April 2019-August 2024). A CUSUM of operative time with segmented regression identified four phases (breakpoints at cases 155, 551, 800). Outcomes included operative metrics (operative, console, docking, patient-in-room times), blood loss, Clavien-Dindo complications, and itemized direct hospital costs under Japan's DPC system; the profit margin was calculated as the profit divided by the total surgical fees. As an institutional benchmark, outcomes from 164 laparoscopic hysterectomies (LH) performed during the same period were also analyzed. Operative time rose in Phase 2 and declined thereafter; major complications (CD ≥ III) remained 0-1.3%. Median total costs decreased from ¥401,116 (Phase 1) to ¥390,035 (Phase 4), a 2.76% reduction; profit margins improved in both benign (to ~ 37%) and malignant cases (to ~ 57%). In the Mastery Phase, RAH demonstrated a higher profit margin for both benign (37.4% vs 35.5%) and malignant (56.8% vs 53.0%) cases compared to the LH benchmark. Team proficiency-beyond individual surgeon skill-was associated with shorter operative time and improved hospital margins at maturity. Findings support institutional standardization and team training to accelerate the RAH learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41042398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.