SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Symptom clusters in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of assessment tools, statistical methods, and symptom patterns.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network temperature and stability of symptom clusters in colorectal cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Observational
- Dynamic Network Analysis of Symptom Profiles and Their Expected Impact on Patients with Colorectal Cancer Receiving Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo summarize the assessment methodology, statistical analysis, and composition of symptom clusters in patients with colorectal cancer.
methodsPublished studies on symptom clusters in patients with colorectal cancer were identified through searches. A search was conducted for studies published between January 2001 and July 2024 using databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The quality of the studies was assessed using a set of criteria from the JBI Reviewers' Manual. A narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted.
resultsEleven studies from seven countries were included, representing 4001 participants. The assessment tools and statistical analyses varied among the studies. Overall, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) and principal component analysis were the most frequently used tools. The most reported symptom clusters were (1) fatigue/lack of energy, anxiety/worry/nervousness, and depression/sadness/upset; (2) nausea, vomiting, and lack of appetite; (3) pain and sleep disorder/insomnia; and (4) pain/abdominal pain and feeling bloated.
conclusionsIn addition to the more general fatigue-anxiety-depression symptom cluster, special attention should be given to colorectal cancer-specific clusters, such as nausea-vomiting-appetite loss and abdominal pain-feeling bloated. The identification of symptom clusters requires careful interpretation based on the assessment tools and statistical methods used. Future research is suggested to prioritize the use of disease-specific measures and advanced analytical approaches, such as network analysis, to enhance the understanding and clinical management of these clusters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41042395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.