SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Gastrocnemius release procedures in the treatment of mechanical metatarsalgia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical metatarsalgia (MM) is a condition marked by forefoot overload, causing pain and functional limitations. While conservative treatments like insoles are often effective, surgery is considered when these fail. Traditional approaches focus on the midfoot or forefoot; however, gastrocnemius release (GR) has emerged as an alternative due to the link between equinus contractures and forefoot overload. This systematic review examines the role of GR in MM treatment, analyzing five studies that met the inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated outcomes following either minimally invasive proximal gastrocnemius release or ultrasound-guided needle-based lengthening. Results showed significant pain reduction, improved American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and greater ankle dorsiflexion. Patient satisfaction was also high. Despite encouraging outcomes, limitations such as small sample sizes, short follow-ups, and methodological differences highlight the need for further research. Nevertheless, GR appears to be a promising option for MM, particularly in cases of isolated gastrocnemius contracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41042374What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.