ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
At-home self-collection device offers an effective and preferred method to engage high BMI women in cervical cancer screening: method comparison study.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- BMI and Initiation of Cancer Screening: A Closer Look at Differences by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex in a Multicenter Population.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026Observational
- HPV-Driven Cervical Carcinogenesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms and Diagnostic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Human papillomavirus self-collection: The long road from scientific evaluation to implementation in screening programs.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansArticle
- Delivering HPV results via telehealth: Patient needs and engagement following an at-home self-collection study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCervical cancer (CxCa) screening rates are lower among women with high BMI in the US, leading to increased prevalence and worse outcomes from cervical dysplasia and cancer in this group. The main barriers to participation in screening relate to the in-clinic speculum exam, which could be overcome with an at-home self-collect (SC) screening device optimized for differing body types.
methodsThis prospective method comparison study recruited 609 screening-eligible participants aged 25 to 65 years, enrolled from November 20, 2023, to April 5, 2024. SC was performed by the participant in a simulated home environment, using a novel device optimized for differing body sizes. Eligible participants collected a vaginal sample with the SC device, followed immediately by a clinician-collection (CC) sample using a speculum and broom. The sample pairs were shipped to the lab, where the SC sample was eluted into PreservCyt and tested on an FDA-approved high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test approved for primary screening. Participants completed usability and preference surveys. Endpoints included the detection of hrHPV between SC and CC samples, as well as other study measures, such as clinical sensitivity for high-grade cervical dysplasia, usability, and preferences by BMI category. Five hundred ninety (590/599) participants had data available for this sub-analysis, based on body mass index (height and weight were recorded via self-report). Results and preferences of participants with a higher BMI (≥ 35) are highlighted herein.
resultsBMI ranged from 16 to 66 for the entire study group, with 114/590 (19.3%) representing a BMI of 35 or greater, comprising the analysis group. The agreement for detection of hrHPV was equivalent across BMI categories. Over a third (36.8%) of participants in Class II (BMI: 35-40) and Class III (BMI > 40) categories had delayed or avoided their cervical cancer screening, and 91% reported that they would be more likely to stay up to date with routine screening if an at-home self-collect option were available. Preferences for self-collect among women in Class II + categories were higher for a self-collect option for screening, reporting that SC made them feel more in control of their experience. DISCUSSION: In women with a BMI ≥ 35, cervical cancer screening by SC with this uniquely designed device demonstrated equivalent or superior HPV detection performance and was strongly preferred by participants. Offering this option could improve screening rates in women with BMI ≥ 35, a group that represents a significant portion of the US population who delay screening and help reduce disparities in cervical cancer incidence and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.