Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Is mental training suitable for teaching a surgical procedure to students? A single-center study using a hernia model.
Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNew methods of teaching surgical skills are in demand. Mental skills training (MST) has been proven effective in the training of surgeons. However, research on medical students is still rare. This explorative study investigates whether a minimalist form of MST can support surgical performance on a hernia model in medical students in a way comparable to students trained using a conventional 'see one, do one' approach.
methodsA novel inexpensive benchtop training model for abdominal wall hernias has been developed. Medical students were randomized into an 'See one, do one' and a 'See one' + MST group. Both groups received the same theoretical instructions, after which a tutor demonstrated the operation on the model. While the first group received training in MST afterwards, the 'See one, do one' group was trained using the benchtop model. Subsequently, both groups performed surgery on the model. Their performance was videotaped and evaluated by experienced surgeons.
resultsA total of 44 medical students took part in the study. The 'See one, do one' group performed significantly better in the professional examination, although the consistency of the stitching was comparable between the two groups and showed no statistically significant differences.
conclusion'See one' + MST group alone without practical training did not result in comparable performance as the 'See one, do one' approach in our study. The MST group performed inferiorly across most objective metrics. While this suggest that MST in isolation may not be sufficient for teaching complex procedures to medical students, it highlights the importance of practical exposure. The potential benefit of combining MST with hands-on training should be investigated in future studies, but cannot be inferred from the current data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.