ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Clinical performance of GAAD score, alpha-fetoprotein, and PIVKA-II in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma in the Vietnamese cohort.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor Vaccines in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Advances, Challenges, and the Path Toward Precision Immunotherapy.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAlpha-fetoprotein (AFP), PIVKA-II, and GAAD have been studied effectively for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), creating an opportunity for effective treatment, thereby improving the survival outcomes. However, evidence was scarce in Vietnam, where patients were largely diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognosis.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted at a single-center in Vietnam to investigate clinical application of standard cutoffs GAAD (2.57), AFP (20 ng/mL), and PIVKA-II (28.4 ng/mL). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for all markers.
resultsAmong 2611 participants, there were 128 (4.9%) diagnosed with HCC. In HCC cases, 91.41% were aged ≥ 50 with a male to female ratio of 3.9. There were 58.59% with cirrhosis and 63.28% with hepatitis, dominated by hepatitis B (52.34%). GAAD score attained 98.33% of AUC, sensitivity of 86.7%, and specificity of 98.4%. GAAD was more effective than PIVKA-II and AFP in screening HCC patients. A strategy of combining PIVKA-II and AFP overcame limitations of these two biomarkers used alone, denoted by higher values of sensitivity (84.4%) and specificity (96.0%).
conclusionThis study in Vietnam revealed the performance of GAAD and PIVKA-II plus AFP in the HCC screening strategy. These strategies appeared effective for HCC patients regardless of tumor size (≤ 2 cm) or patient age (≥ 50). Further study is encouraged to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.