ArticleJournal of vision2025
Eye movements during gaze perception.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gaze of other people is of interest to human observers, particularly in cases of direct gaze, that is, when it targets the observer. Gaze direction research has successfully clarified some of the mechanisms underlying gaze perception, but little is known about the active perception of direct gaze. Three eye-tracking experiments were conducted in which fixations and scan paths were recorded during the task to judge direct gaze. Somewhat surprisingly, judgments were issued after a single eye fixation only in a minority of trials. In most cases, observers fixated both eyes of a looker model, sometimes even scanning them repeatedly. Fixation duration showed a consistent pattern, where first fixations were longer when the task response followed immediately, and second fixations were shorter just before the response. A direct-gaze bias was tested but was not found: visiting the second eye was even more likely when the first fixation was on a straight-gazing rather than an averted eye. There was no systematic pattern in the final fixation, contradicting the expectation that it would fall on the abducting (leading) eye. It is argued that overt looking behavior during direct gaze judgments reflects a cumulative decision process that spans over consecutive fixations. Several factors may contribute to the high incidence of multiple-eye scans, including vergence and angle kappa. Vergence, in particular, is considered an important candidate, because the depth of fixation is ambiguous when only one eye is visible, but can be limited by probing the gaze direction of both eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.