ReviewJournal of vision2025
Computational elements of natural vision.
Review in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultimately, human behavior needs to be understood in the context of natural everyday tasks. Over the last two decades, a number of observations of natural visually guided behavior have accumulated. These observations help define the functional demands placed on the visual system in a variety of tasks, but progress has been limited by the diversity of natural behavior and by the lack of unified theoretical structures to guide understanding of the underlying processes. In this article, we summarize some recent attempts that might provide a template for a more formal approach. This is possible because it has become clear that natural behavior has many regularities reflecting the underlying sensorimotor decisions. We first summarize these regularities and then show how simple visually guided behaviors can be well described by partially observable Markov decision processes. We give examples of how laboratory experiments can be designed to elicit the common elements of natural behavior and how such experiments afford control of the statistical structure of tasks, thereby allowing formal modeling. Finally, we suggest that a new exciting avenue using recently introduced inverse models may lead the way forward, as it recovers the intrinsic properties of human perception, cognition, and action, which are intertwined in natural behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.