Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042029›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Breaking and restoring ocular balance: Temporal interactions in binocular rivalry and stereopsis.

Rong Jiang, Ming Meng

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rong JiangKey Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences, Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Ming MengKey Laboratory of Brain, Cognition and Education Sciences, Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binocular integration and interocular suppression are fundamental processes underlying binocular vision, giving rise to stereopsis and binocular rivalry, respectively. To investigate how the visual system dynamically coordinates these processes to form a unified percept, we conducted four psychophysical experiments examining the temporal interactions between binocular rivalry and stereopsis. In Experiment 1a, binocular rivalry, especially with high-contrast stimuli, impaired subsequent stereopsis, significantly elevating average stereo detection thresholds from 60.5 to 111.8 arcsec. Experiment 1b revealed no effect on contrast detection, confirming that the suppression was specific to stereopsis rather than due to general attentional distraction. Experiment 2a revealed that preceding stereopsis rebalanced subsequent rivalry dynamics by reducing ocular dominance asymmetry and increasing mixed percepts, without affecting alternation rate. Experiment 2b further demonstrated that anti-correlated stereograms, which do not elicit stable stereopsis, exerted no effect on subsequent rivalry dynamics. These findings underscore a dynamic interplay between binocular integration and suppression in resolving perceptual ambiguity and achieving unified visual perception. Crucially, our results reinforce that stereopsis is not merely a passive consequence of binocular integration, but actively contributes to rebalancing ocular dominance, thus offering insights for interventions aimed at restoring binocular function.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionDominance, OcularVision, BinocularVision DisparityAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychophysicsSensory ThresholdsTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41042029
PMCPMC12517368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.