ArticlePerceptual and motor skills2026
Between-Day Reliability of Visuomotor Response Times Under Stroboscopic Conditions Varying in Difficulty.
Article in Perceptual and motor skills, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The effects of stroboscopic vision training on physical performance in athletes: a systematic review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroboscopic training (ST) effectively enhances visuomotor performance in athletes, yet the dose-response relationship between ST difficulty and performance remains unclear. This study investigated the influence of ST difficulty on visuomotor response times (RTs) and assessed the reliability of RTs under stroboscopic vision.Twenty-two healthy young individuals performed a visuomotor response task on three separate days, responding to light-based stimuli under normal and stroboscopic vision at three difficulty levels (FAST = 6 Hz; MEDIUM = 4 Hz; SLOW = 2.25 Hz). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and Coefficients of Variation (CoV) assessed relative and absolute reliability. Repeated measures ANOVAs examined the effects of difficulty (NORMAL, FAST, MEDIUM, SLOW) and session day (I, II, III) on RTs.Results showed significantly slower RTs at higher difficulty levels (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.