ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025
Bacterial 16S Ribosomal Gene Fingerprints as a Tool to Diagnose and Mitigate Fish Larvae Gut Dysbiosis.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bacterial 16S Ribosomal Gene Fingerprints as a Tool to Diagnose and Mitigate Fish Larvae Gut Dysbiosis.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dysbiosis is associated with shifts in the diversity or relative abundance of beneficial versus harmful bacteria, leading to health issues in organisms. This study investigated gut bacterial dysbiosis associated with larval quality using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The gut microbiome of gilthead sea bream and European sea bass, key commercial species and vertebrate models, was examined in high- and low-quality larvae batches from several European hatcheries. Larval quality, hatchery site and species influenced bacterial diversity in the gut. Individuals from larval batches that performed well had higher microbial diversity in the gut and individuals from batches that performed poorly had a gut microbiota dominated by pathogenic Vibrio (e.g., V. aestuarianus and V. cortegadensis). The bacterial dysbiosis index revealed a notable predominance of Fusobacteriota and Firmicutes phyla, Thermoanaerobacteria class and Lactobacillaceae, Moritellaceae, Clostridiaceae, Thiotrichaceae and Shewanellaceae families in good-quality larvae batches, and a prevalence of the Proteobacteria phylum, Gammaproteobacteria class, Sphingomonadaceae and Vibrionaceae families in the gut of individuals from poor-quality larvae batches. A positive dysbiosis index (cutoff > 0.4) was associated with a high risk of decreased larval performance and quality. Additionally, the abundance of Clostridium_sensu_stricto_15, Shewanellaceae_unclassified, Cetobacterium, Psychrilyobacter, Moritella and Latilactobacillus genera in the gut of good production batches, and the Vibrio genus in the gut of poor production batches, identified these genus as potential markers for diagnosing and mitigating bacterial dysbiosis in fish and potentially other vertebrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.