ArticleOncology reports2025
miR‑100‑5p and miR‑203a‑3p suppress esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression by targeting FKBP5.
Article in Oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNAs in Esophageal Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Progression, Prognosis and Chemoresistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- miR-100-5p Enhances Cell Cycle-Mediated Chemoresistance by Modulating the CTDSPL/pRB/E2F1 Signaling Pathway in Oxaliplatin-Resistant Colorectal Cancer Cells.Oncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poorly differentiated cancers, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), exhibit higher malignant potential and worse prognoses than well‑differentiated types. The present study aimed to identify microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) involved in ESCC progression and their target mRNAs, focusing on tumor differentiation. miRNA candidates were selected using a miRNA array‑based approach and GEO datasets, comparing expression levels between poorly and non‑poorly differentiated ESCC. Clinical samples (n=61) and cell lines were analyzed to determine the significance and function of the selected miRNAs and their target mRNA. miR‑100‑5p and miR‑203a‑3p were significantly downregulated in poorly differentiated ESCC, with lower expression strongly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (miR‑100‑5p: P=0.02; miR‑203a‑3p: P=0.05) and relapse‑free survival (RFS) (miR‑100‑5p: P=0.04; miR‑203a‑3p: P=0.12). Overexpression of these miRNAs suppressed cell migration and invasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.