Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041811›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2025

The Great Genotyper: a graph-based method for population genotyping of small and structural variants.

Moustafa Shokrof, Mohamed Abuelanin, C Titus Brown, Tamer A Mansour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moustafa ShokrofDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1040-2145
Mohamed AbuelaninDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3419-4785
C Titus BrownDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6001-2677
Tamer A MansourDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4747-4241

Funding

Morris Animal Foundation D22CLP-505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-read sequencing (LRS) enables high-quality structural variant (SV) discovery. SV genotypers utilize these precise call sets to improve the recall and precision of genotyping in short-read sequencing (SRS) samples. With the extensive growth in publicly available SRS datasets, it is now possible to calculate accurate population allele frequencies of SVs. However, reprocessing hundreds of terabytes of raw SRS data to genotype new variants is impractical for population-scale studies, a computational challenge known as the N+1 problem (i.e., the challenge of re-genotyping an entire cohort for one additional variant). Overcoming this computational bottleneck is essential for analyzing new SVs from the growing number of pangenomes, public genomic databases, and pathogenic variant discovery studies.

resultsWe propose the Great Genotyper, a population-scale genotyping workflow to address the N+1 problem. Applied to a human dataset, the workflow begins by preprocessing 4.2k short-read samples of a total of 183 TB raw data to create an 867-GB Counting Colored de Bruijn Graph (CCDG). The Great Genotyper uses this CCDG to genotype a list of phased or unphased variants, leveraging the CCDG population information to increase both precision and recall. The Great Genotyper offers the same accuracy as the state-of-the-art genotypers while achieving unprecedented performance. It took about 100 hours to genotype 4.5M variants across the 4.2k samples and calculate their population allele frequencies using 1 server with 32 cores and 145 GB of memory. The Great Genotyper opens the door to new ways to study SVs. For example, using the premade index, we demonstrate the Great Genotyper's application in finding pathogenic variants by calculating accurate allele frequency for novel SVs. Also, we used it to create a 4k reference panel by genotyping variants from the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium (HPRC). The new reference panel allows for SV imputation from genotyping microarrays. Moreover, we genotype the human GWAS Catalog and merge its variants with the 4k reference panel. We show 6,253 events of high linkage between the HPRC's SVs and nearby GWAS single-nucleotide polymorphisms, which can help in interpreting the effect of these SVs on gene functions. This analysis uncovers the detailed haplotype structure of the human fibrinogen locus and revives the pathogenic association of a 28-bp insertion in the FGA gene with thromboembolic disorders.

conclusionThe Great Genotyper solves the N+1 problem for population-scale genotyping of small and structural variants, offering both high accuracy and efficiency. Its ability to rapidly re-genotype large cohorts paves the road for several new studies of SVs.

Indexed as

Genomic Structural VariationGenotyping TechniquesSoftwareComputational BiologyGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationGenome, HumanGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansallele frequencycounting colored de Bruijn graphgenotypingpangenomestructural variants

Identifiers

PMID41041811
PMCPMC12491952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.