ArticleGigaScience2025
Improving taxonomic inference from ancient environmental metagenomes by masking microbial-like regions in reference genomes.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lifestyle Impacts the Oral Microbiome of Classical and Post-Classical Societies in Italy.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026Article
- Ancient DNA reconstruction of late holocene ecosystems within the Carpathian basin from paleo-meanders and archaeological deposits.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Metagenomic biodiversity assessment within an offshore wind farm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improving taxonomic inference from ancient environmental metagenomes by masking microbial-like regions in reference genomes.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ancient environmental DNA is increasingly vital for reconstructing past ecosystems, particularly when paleontological and archaeological tissue remains are absent. Detecting ancient plant and animal DNA in environmental samples relies on using extensive eukaryotic reference genome databases for profiling metagenomics data. However, many eukaryotic genomes contain regions with high sequence similarity to microbial DNA, which can lead to the misclassification of bacterial and archaeal reads as eukaryotic. This issue is especially problematic in ancient eDNA datasets, where plant and animal DNA is typically present at very low abundance. In this study, we present a method for identifying bacterial- and archaeal-like sequences in eukaryotic genomes and apply it to nearly 3,000 reference genomes from NCBI RefSeq and GenBank (vertebrates, invertebrates, plants) as well as the 1,323 PhyloNorway plant genome assemblies from herbarium material from northern high-latitude regions. We find that microbial-like regions are widespread across eukaryotic genomes and provide a comprehensive resource of their genomic coordinates and taxonomic annotations. This resource enables the masking of microbial-like regions during profiling analyses, thereby improving the reliability of ancient environmental metagenomic datasets for downstream analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.